TIFF 2011 Roundup: The winners, and the losers, from this year’s installment of the Toronto International Film Festival

Well, it’s a wrap. Some might suggest that there are no winners and losers at TIFF, and that the festival is a harmonious celebration of filmmaking and the artistic spirit. For our part, we say these people are wrong. Life is a competition, and we’ve got the goods on the stars, the parties, the neighbourhoods, the red carpet galas and the films that came out on top—and on the bottom—this year, after the jump.
1. Celebrity stars
WINNER: Ryan Gosling
Good looks, red carpet charm, quality performances in Drive and The Ides of March and more good looks have made the Gos the new man about town. We’d like to say the torch has been passed from George Clooney to Gosling, but we’re scared Clooney might beat us to death with it.
LOSER: Madonna
After spitting venom at some poor hydrangeas at the Venice Film Festival, Madge failed to redeem herself here, allegedly having eight TIFF volunteers turn and face a wall to avoid gazing upon her countenance. Plus, we hear her movie sucks.
2. Splashy A-list party
WINNER: David Cronenberg’s A Dangerous Method after-party
Let’s not kid ourselves—what makes or breaks a TIFF party are the stars, and the party for A Dangerous Method had them by the Cadillac-load: George Clooney, Kiera Knightley, Jon Hamm, Jonah Hill, Jimmy Kimmel, Ewan McGregor, and the list goes on.
LOSER: The CAA Burroughes party
What else makes or breaks a party? Being able to get inside. Sadly, the elevator in the Burroughes building moves slower than Francis Ford Coppola, and the six flights of stairs were packed solid for the Creative Artists Agency’s shindig—stars first, plebeians in the rear.
3. Red carpet gala
WINNER: The Ides of March
Really, Ryan Gosling is the only star we need—but at this red carpet gala presentation we certainly weren’t starved for choice: George Clooney, Marisa Tomei, Evan Rachel Wood and, of course, the ever-present Dave Matthews were there, among others.
LOSER: Twixt
The Twixt red carpet presentation had possibly the least glitz, glam and gushing of them all, with only Francis Ford Coppola (a legendary director but not much of a looker) and Val Kilmer (long past his Top Gun glory days) gracing the gala with their presence.
4. Neighbourhood
WINNER: Theatre District
The TIFF Bell Lightbox has officially become a black hole, crushing anything of relevance at TIFF into an extremely fashionable singularity. Oh, and the Ritz-Carlton didn’t hurt matters on that account either (apparently, stars like to stay there).
LOSER: Yorkville
Yorkville has long been the go-to destination for celebrity sightings, but this year saw it tumble into irrelevance (excluding a very dashing Jon Hamm going for a stroll). At least it’ll always have that big rock thing.
5. Film Title
WINNER: This is not a Film
The title succinctly evokes the story of a filmmaker banned from his craft, working in captivity on a project that may never be. No, it’s not a film—it’s a work of art. Honorable mentions: Machine Gun Preacher, Whore’s Glory, We Ate the Children Last and Sorry, Rabbi.
LOSER: Salmon Fishing in the Yemen
This title somehow makes the biggest buy of the festival ($5 million) sound like a dry VHS documentary forgotten in some dusty bin in the back of a dilapidated library in Timmins. But maybe that’s what they were going for. Dishonorable mentions: Slow Action, Azhagarsamy’s Horse, Doubles With Slight Pepper and A Film Portrait on Reconstructing 12 Possibilities that Preceded the Disappearance of Zoe Dean Drum.
I think that it is unfair to refer to Yorkville as being irrelevant during this year`s TIFF.The streets were packed,parties were held in the area and many stars chose to stay at The Hazelton,The Windsor Arms and the Four Seasons.
The theatre district was a nightmare.Venues for the films were too close together on King St.and people were forced to walk in the street.If the Bell Lightbox and Roy Thomson Hall were to have been the stars of the show then someone should have suggested wider sidewalks.There was an excitement when the festivals hub was in Yorkville.You knew that something special was happening.With the crowds spread out in the entertainment and theatre districts, it just had the feel of club night in the city.
Cronenberg’s film is A Dangerous Method, not A Dangerous Mind. Small oversight.
How can Yorkville expect to reclaim it’s former role as the hub of TIFF when there is only one decent movie theatre complex (the Varsity) left up there? The Cumberland is well past it’s prime. The festival is about screening movies, after all. TIFF plans to use the Princess of Wales for more screenings next year. Accomodation wise, the Shangri La will be opening soon to complement the Ritz and the Thompson, while The Sutton Place is badly dated and the new Four Seasons site is far east of the Yorkville hub. Locating the box office on the concourse level of Metro Hall worked better than the old Manulife Centre location, allowing workers from the nearby King-Bay business towers to pop over on foot to get tix at lunch. Bottom line: the migration of TIFF southward to King & John makes good sense and is unlikely to be reversed. Anyone who believes otherwise is peering through a romantic / nostalgic prism.
I am not suggesting that Yorkville expects to or ever can reclaim it`s former role as the hub of TIFF.That would be very narrow minded on anyone`s part.As TIFF grows in size and notoriety ,the venues and focus must expand as well.
I just objected to the writer calling Yorkville irrelevant.
Madonna is just hideous in every way….