Canada’s big-city mayors have a wish list for Ottawa—except for Rob Ford

• MONEY: It’s no surprise that everyone wants more money. What’s interesting is that these mayors, by and large, don’t just want handouts from the feds—they want to change the way money is raised in this country. (We’ve mentioned Naheed Nenshi’s ideas on this front before.) Basically, with stimulus funding running out, mayors across the country are united in saying there needs to be a new way to fund cities.

• INFRASTRUCTURE: If the feds and provinces aren’t willing to give cities some dedicated tax room to fix their own problems, the least they can do is address to most urgent stuff: crumbling roads and bridges, bursting water mains and the like. The main reason they’re worried is that there’s no sign this money is on its way.

• A LITTLE RESPECT: The first step is admitting that we have a problem. In this case, the “problem” is that the vast majority of Canadians live in cities, and according to some mayors there’s political resistance against just acknowledging this. Pat Fiacco, mayor of Regina, told the Globe, “I think politicians really need to pay attention, both provincial and federal, to the fact that the majority of Canadians live in cities. We could make this country a lot better if the federal government would actually allow municipal leaders to get involved… They don’t consider us important politically at all.”

While we would love to see all of these things in next week’s Conservative plan, we expect the budget will have much, much less than is needed for infrastructure spending, and absolutely nothing in terms of permanent funding for cities. (Prove us wrong, Prime Minister!) As for respect, the Conservatives are trawling for votes in cities, so some symbolic gesture might be just what the electoral doctor ordered. We’ll find out for sure on Tuesday. Stay tuned.

• Canada’s big-city mayors are wondering: After the stimulus, what’s next? [Globe and Mail]