Dog’s best friend: the story behind the Toronto Humane Society’s mutiny, raid and shutdown
Tim Trow had one sacred rule for the Toronto Humane Society: save every pet. But the shelter grew overcrowded and chaotic, the staff mutinied, and the police shut the place down.
Bandit was less than two years old when he arrived in August 2003 at the squat River Street building occupied by the Toronto Humane Society. A dark brown pit bull–Labrador cross with a square face, he was surrendered by his owner after he attacked her three-year-old grandson, leaving him with head wounds that required 200 stitches.
Bandit found an ally in Tim Trow, the society’s president at the time. Trow, a tall, imposing 300-pound lawyer with short greying hair, kept the dog loose and unmuzzled in the THS meeting room he used as his office. They shared the space with as many as 30 caged cats and kittens. Bandit would bark and lunge at their cages, and once closed his powerful jaws on a mother cat’s front paw, pulling off the skin and tissue—“degloving” it, as veterinarians say—and fracturing several bones.
Bandit became a symbol of the lengths to which Trow would go to reduce the THS’s euthanasia rate to almost nil. He protected diseased and aggressive animals, even those that were considered to be dangerous or close to death. The biggest obstacle in Trow’s crusade was the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the provincial body that oversees 46 branches and affiliate shelters, including the THS. To Trow, the OSPCA represented the worst kind of animal management, prioritizing population control over care.
The directors of the OSPCA, in turn, suspected Trow was an out-of-control zealot who put his staff at risk by sheltering animals like Bandit. Many employees said they were scared of the dog and kept their distance, and at least three complained of being bitten. The OSPCA heard numerous complaints about Trow’s management style and his vindictiveness toward any staff member who disagreed with him. And they believed his reluctance to euthanize had resulted in a facility where almost every room, including Trow’s office, was crowded with neglected animals.
The OSPCA’s directors decided Trow had to go: the THS had become a mismanaged sanctuary, with Trow and his team collecting animals that the staff couldn’t begin to take care of. To get rid of him, they’d have to prove that the city’s biggest self-professed lover of animals was a torturer and a criminal.
The OSPCA, which formed in 1873, is an organization with unusual powers: a charity that enforces provincial laws. In addition to running animal shelters, the OSPCA hires and licenses inspectors, called peace officers, who work on behalf of the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services to investigate incidents of animal cruelty by individuals and by operations like puppy mills. Although it receives government funding to train inspectors, it relies on charitable donations to carry out its enforcement work. (In 2009, it received gifts worth $15.6 million.) In the decades after the OSPCA’s founding, as various humane societies formed across the province, many joined forces with it. Branches are now governed by the main OSPCA office in Newmarket, while affiliates manage their own affairs and hire their own inspectors.
The THS is the rebel affiliate of the OSPCA family. It was launched 14 years after the OSPCA, by John Joseph Kelso, a Toronto journalist who was concerned about the cruel treatment of animals in the city. Many of the THS’s recent members were involved in or influenced by the 1970s radical animal rights movement, which condemned the subjugation of animals in society. One THS president staged a hunger strike protesting medical testing on animals; others have organized campaigns against the fur industry and whaling.
The practice of euthanasia has been the biggest flashpoint in the OSPCA’s dispute with the THS. Before deciding to euthanize an animal, veterinarians typically consider its level of pain or distress, the probability of curing serious diseases or chronic medical conditions, and whether the animal is aggressive or dangerous. An overdose of the drug phenobarbital is injected into a vein on a front leg (more common for dogs) or hind leg (more common for cats, who dislike the anaesthetic’s smell of alcohol). The phenobarbital usually shuts down the animal’s heart and lungs within a minute, sometimes before the full dose is delivered. It induces sleep, making for a calm death, although reflex brain activity will sometimes make an animal twitch.
The THS—especially under Trow—kept euthanasia rates low. He argued that if our hospitals didn’t have enough beds, or if pneumonia was prevalent there, we wouldn’t exterminate the patients. The OSPCA and most other shelters regularly dole out lethal injections in order to keep the shelter population under control or to cope with infectious diseases. This past May, there was a public outcry when the OSPCA’s Newmarket shelter revealed plans to euthanize more than 300 animals because of a ringworm outbreak. (Ringworm, similar to athlete’s foot in people, is contagious but curable and not terribly painful.) In the end, the OSPCA euthanized 102 cats while protesters lined the streets demanding the animals be spared.
Trow grew up on a farm in North York, surrounded by dogs, cats, rabbits and horses. He worked for 28 years as a solicitor for the province, dealing with First Nations land claims and the implementation of French language services. He’s now 65 and lives in a quaint red-brick house at Mount Pleasant and Davisville with his partner, Richard Stainton, a therapeutic counsellor.
In the 1970s, as a young lawyer, Trow spent many evenings perched on benches outside stands offering horse and carriage rides to tourists. He documented the outside temperature and the hours the horses worked, and he tracked police reports of traffic accidents involving horses. He took his findings to city council, and soon the city began to regulate the industry so aggressively that it essentially collapsed.
Trow became a member of the THS in the mid-’70s and was eventually elected to the board, along with several of his friends and fellow animal activists. He took over as president in 1982. Not everyone on the board was a fan. A group of old guard members disliked Trow’s autocratic managerial style and accused him of demoralizing staff and taking in more animals than the shelter could handle. The chief veterinarian told the media that the board should be charged with cruelty to animals, citing a new, Trow-sponsored foster care program that “forced these poor animals to live sick, against nature’s way.”
In 1984, with the THS mired in controversy and his term as president ending, Trow quietly slipped away and focused on his legal work. Ten years ago, he saw an opportunity to seize control again when the board, in an attempt to sideline its critics, annulled the voting privileges of the society’s 1,000-plus members. Trow launched a suit against the board, and a judge agreed to nullify the new voting rules. As the man who fought for them, Trow asked members to give him their proxy votes at the next board election. He and his allies won by a landslide, and he once again became president of the THS.
Although the presidency of the THS is a volunteer position, Trow often worked seven days a week—he retired from his job with the province in 2000 and received a pension. He dedicated many of his hours to writing articles for the society’s AnimalTalk magazine and letters protesting such perceived animal rights abuses as the seal hunt and Fido ads depicting a dog tethered by a ball and chain. Trow’s disciples believed he was an animal-care revolutionary. He converted part of a customer parking lot into a dog park and built a $1-million cat ward with views of the rooftop patio. He championed the kitten nursery, where volunteers and staff bottle-fed newborns, and he spent $8,000 installing nebulizer units (oxygen tents for treating upper respiratory infections) as well as hospital-quality sanitizers for cages and food bowls. His insistence on prolonging the lives of animals appealed to the society’s members and opened their wallets. The majority of the shelter’s operating funds came from preauthorized monthly donations. Around 30 per cent of the $10 million yearly budget came from bequests. (The pianist Glenn Gould loved animals and left half his estate to the society.)
Trow often bragged about the society’s low euthanasia rates. He printed tables in AnimalTalk comparing the THS’s rates with the city pound and several OSPCA shelters. Where the average rate for shelters in Ontario is around 50 per cent, the THS’s in the Trow years hovered around seven.
Some of Trow’s schemes for the shelter were less effective. He introduced a system of colour coding that the shelter used to identify aggressive dogs: white and red for the most dangerous, orange and yellow for the moderately difficult ones, and green for the gentlest. Though staff considered it a useful tool, it was quickly scrapped. Trow’s detractors say he cared more about the welfare of the animals than the staff and was primarily concerned that the system made it too easy to avoid caring for dogs with violent streaks or histories of biting.
As much as Trow obsessed over saving every animal at the THS, he didn’t have enough staff to care for them. Turnover was high—some people quit in frustration, and others were fired. Some registered veterinary technicians were replaced by cheaper animal care workers with little specialized training. THS employees and volunteers worked in fear of Trow’s tantrums. One volunteer says of Trow, “If he didn’t get his way, he’d flip over tables, pull his own hair and bite his fingers.” Trow insists the complaints about him are untrue. “I dealt only with senior management,” he says. “If I saw things weren’t clean or such, we’d have meetings and I’d raise my voice because it needed to get done.” His supporters viewed his behaviour as proof of passionate dedication to the job.
From the moment Kate MacDonald took over as the CEO of the OSPCA in 2007, she heard stories about problems at the THS. A plump, middle-aged woman with short, dark-brown hair and a round, serious face, she arrived at the job after many years of experience in the non-profit sector, including as a fundraiser at the United Way. Complaints about the THS had been submitted to the OSPCA anonymously by the society’s own staff. In the spring of 2009, MacDonald met with a former THS veterinarian named Amanda Frank who told her about neglected animals and how she was forbidden to euthanize without permission. The Globe and Mail, relying on tips from unhappy staff and a rogue group of THS members called the Association for the Reform of the THS, ran a series of stories about troubling conditions at the shelter. MacDonald was keenly aware of criticism that the OSPCA had let the THS run amok.
On June 2, MacDonald’s inspectors descended on River Street. The media was alerted (though no one admits to making the call) and showed up first. The shelter’s managers guided the OSPCA inspectors through the building to look at the animals. Of the shelter’s 1,000-plus animals, one cat was found to be in desperate need of medical treatment. While the facility was cramped, it didn’t appear nearly as badly run as the OSPCA’s sources and the Globe had claimed.
But soon after the search, a group of THS staff told the OSPCA that their managers, tipped off by the early arrival of reporters, had ordered them to hide animals from the inspectors, and some animals were hastily euthanized before the inspection. One vet on duty said workers ran into the clinic, holding sickly-looking animals and telling her, “They can’t see this!” A manager told one staff member, “Tim wants us to move all the sick cats, anything that looks really bad.” Others said employees were moving animals from rooms the inspectors hadn’t seen yet into rooms they’d already visited.
From then on, the OSPCA’s investigation became more secretive. MacDonald hired the Investigators Group, a private detective firm, which conducted interviews with disgruntled past and present THS staff members and volunteers, and heard more stories about understaffing and overcrowding, Trow’s micromanaging, animals suffering in cages and missing their treatments, and vets forbidden to euthanize. One vet testified there were two to three dozen animals that, over the eight months she worked there, should have been euthanized but weren’t; she would find them dead in their cages or would get permission to euthanize only in the last minutes before death, when an animal was gasping for air. In one case, several diabetic cats died after untrained staff administered too much insulin.
The detectives also combed through Trow’s personal garbage after it had been left out on the curb and found he was ghost-writing many of the supervisors’ correspondence, such as internal discipline letters—evidence, they argued, of his control over the THS’s daily affairs, and of his knowledge of its problems.
All of the evidence went into an application for three warrants, and on November 26, 2009, the OSPCA descended once again on the THS. To prevent another tip-off to THS management, no OSPCA investigators based in the GTA were told about the raid. Instead, it was conducted by a team of 40 consisting of private investigators, Toronto police officers, private security guards, and OSPCA inspectors and agents from Hamilton, London and the Niagara region. To further ensure no one leaked the plan, before the raid, the non-police team members were asked to deposit their cellphones into a basket carried by the president of the private investigation firm. The media found out, despite their efforts. A Citytv news crew spotted the convoy of OSPCA trucks and police cars driving along Shuter Street, suspected another raid, and followed them to the humane society.
When the team reached Trow’s office, the first thing they encountered was Bandit. He growled and charged at an officer, who shot a burst of pepper spray in retaliation. Bandit yelped and backed off. The inspectors handcuffed Trow, as well as the society’s chief veterinarian, Steve Sheridan, and three managers. They gathered the five men in a waiting room next to the reception area on the first floor and informed them that they were charged with conspiracy to commit an indictable offence of cruelty to animals, causing unnecessary suffering to animals and obstructing a peace officer (a charge dating back to the supposed cover-up of evidence during the June raid).
The officers led the handcuffed group out of the building and to the assembled police cruisers, providing the news cameras stationed outside with a perp walk. While the five men were taken to 52 Division, inspectors were also rifling through Trow’s car and home for evidence. In his house, they found boxes and boxes of THS paperwork, which they carted away in a cube van.
The OSPCA inspectors counted 1,238 animals—far too many, they say, for the facility to comfortably accommodate. A veterinarian who had left the shelter nine months earlier and came back to help with the cleanup claims that she had been the last veterinarian to make an entry on many of the animals’ kennel cards. The next day, acting on a tip from an employee, inspectors lifted a section of a suspended ceiling and found an abandoned live trap containing a cat’s petrified remains. An OSPCA investigator immediately disclosed the gruesome finding to the reporters congregated outside the building. When asked how long the cat had been in the trap, he answered gravely, “The cat appears to be mummified.”
The OSPCA was concerned with how the raid and arrests would play out in the media and hired the Daisy Consulting Group, a PR company led by Liberal strategist Warren Kinsella, to coordinate interviews and help provide journalists with ghastly stories of abuse at the shelter. It was a Daisy employee who filmed the discovery of the mummified cat and later led the media on guided tours of the shelter.
MacDonald arrived at the THS soon after the raid and worked on site for four months. She hired a counsellor to meet with employees who had been reporting problems to the OSPCA for months and worked in fear of getting caught. Extra vets and animal workers were brought in to help.
One hundred and forty-seven of the THS animals were promptly euthanized. The remaining animals were adopted out or placed in foster homes. The last animal at the shelter was Bandit. He was deemed to still be dangerous and was euthanized. Trow, for all his proselytizing about the shelter’s mission, had failed over six years to rehabilitate his companion.
Trow resigned from his job, and in a final blow to his regime, the OSPCA requested new elections for the THS board of directors. The new board was formed by a group of THS reformers, employees, some current and former volunteers, and veterinarians who had complained about the conditions under Trow. Michael Downey, the CEO of Tennis Canada, was elected the new THS president. He had shown interest in running for the board a year earlier but was told by Trow there were no vacancies.
Trow bragged about his dramatic lowering of the THS’s euthanasia rate to seven per cent. The typical rate at other shelters: 50
MacDonald’s victory over Trow was short-lived. On August 16, less than nine months after the raid, Trow and his four co-accused were cleared of all charges. The Crown’s lawyers felt that the investigators had violated the rights of the defendants in order to obtain their evidence, so much of it wouldn’t be admissible in court. It turned out the OSPCA, despite all its grandstanding about policing its affiliates, had botched the bust. It had used a search warrant with no end date, and items unrelated to the case were mistakenly seized from Trow’s house, including his grandmother’s pendant necklace and his prostate medications. The OSPCA had also compromised the investigation’s findings by touring reporters through the facility during the raid. And, in the Crown’s view, the witness statements recorded by the OSPCA’s private investigators failed to provide sufficient evidence that Trow and the board intentionally mistreated animals.
The ruling was an embarrassment for the OSPCA. MacDonald and the OSPCA chair Rob Godfrey held a melodramatic press conference in which they excoriated the Crown for not taking animal cruelty seriously. MacDonald sat beside pictures of infection-ridden cats (evidence from the raid) as Godfrey cuddled an eight-week-old stray kitten they named Hope. “This cat had a better chance of survival being abandoned on the side of the road than pretty much any animal did about one year ago at the Toronto Humane Society,” Godfrey intoned. He denounced the Crown for not looking at the investigation’s evidence, and for not letting the case come before a judge. He said he planned to complain to the attorney general. (The AG’s office stood behind the decision.)
Still, MacDonald had succeeded in transforming the THS into a radically different kind of shelter. The new board and management repainted the facilities, enlarged the animal cages, retrained staff and volunteers, and limited intake so they won’t end up with unmanageable numbers. The THS accepts unwanted pets but no longer takes in strays, redirecting them instead to Toronto Animal Services, which euthanizes many of the animals it receives.
The biggest problem at the new THS is money. Members, who pay an annual fee of $40, have dropped from 2,800 under Trow to 1,675. Monthly donations have plummeted, too, from approximately $800,000 to $500,000. For all Trow’s faults, his passionate activism had a following.
In the year since the raid, Trow has lost more than 100 pounds. He told me how he speed walks through Mount Pleasant Cemetery and along the Belt Line trail each morning. When he isn’t walking, he tends his garden.
The first few months after his arrest were extremely lonely: as a condition of his release from jail, he wasn’t allowed to talk to any THS members—a group that included most of his friends and relatives.
I visited Trow at home and discovered evidence of a pack rat. The tables and floors of his home are covered in piles of old tablecloths, sheets, kitchenware and books that belonged to his deceased parents. In his living room, there’s a painting hanging on the wall of an old family horse named Ella. He shows me some empty spots on the floor and says the piles of papers that had been there were all taken in the raid. “It was time to redecorate anyway,” he says with a hint of sarcasm.
He claims he’s baffled by the campaign against him. “I never hurt an animal in my life,” he says. “And if we were unwise as an organization or made mistakes, we tried to be as wise as we could be.” He is building a file of news clippings and court documents, just in case he decides to sue the OSPCA. “I want peace for what I think was a scandalous thing done to me.”
There may be some truth to his claims. The OSPCA presumed the worst, and carried out its raid on the THS and its arrest of Trow as if the main goal was a public shaming, not the reformation of the shelter. The arrests were a warning to other affiliates to keep in line with OSPCA policy and avoid the emotionally charged terrain of animal rights advocacy. In reality, many of the people who work and volunteer at shelters like the THS do so because they feel profound bonds with their vulnerable charges—especially the pathetic lost causes like Bandit—and saving them from a needle of phenobarbital becomes an act of heroism.
Trow is currently without a pet. His dalmatians, King and Sable, died in the past two years. Sable was euthanized after her cancer was found to have metastasized; King died of old age. Trow is now waiting to hear of another unwanted dog. He knows it won’t be long. There are so many out there.
Oh and I thought the fight between the THS and the OSPCA had to do with having to fight for the same animal lovers dollar. This article is very one sided. A 50% KILL RATE is NOT acceptable and speaks to how TERRIBLE a shelter is run. I wonder what the OSPCA’s KILL rate is and WHY does THAT charity have POLICE POWERS with NO oversight? What nut jobs made THAT decision?
There were many sane people who worked at the THS during Tim Trow’s tenure as volunteers, animal care workers, vets and business professionals in marketing, fundraising, communications, etc.
Trow’s mismanagement came from far more than just ruling with an iron fist to help the animals and lower the euthanasia rate. People quit (and stopped donating, volunteering, supporting, etc) because he was an unstable, unprofessional, inappropriate individual who should never have been given the responsibility of running a shelter and a business.
He ended up hurting animals by not empowering the vets to make the appropriate decision on how to care for a particular animals, and not addressing the root of the problem of overcrowding which was spaying/neutering. During his tenure, there was no policy in place and as such, most animals left the shelter unfixed. Instead, his focus was on boasting about the low euthanasia rate.
As a result, the animals did not receive proper care and the conditions were appalling under his direction.
It’s unfortunate that an organization with such a solid support base was neglected and left to sink for so long. It will be that much harder to restore their reputation now.
This article is a random collection of facts that does not address the real issue: this is NOT about Tim Trow or the OSPCA. It IS about the animals that were caught in the crossfire between politics, power, personal feelings and revenue for the THS. Tim Trow recognized that donated monies rose as the euthanasia rate went down. So animals suffered. The OSPCA is equally culpable here, but I’m tired of hearing about Mr. Trow’s hardships… I am not one who is quick to kill animals with behaviour issues, but I am quick to criticize Mr. Trow for not finding a professional who could properly rehabilitate Bandit, for allowing Bandit to continue to live in a state of mental chaos, for confining Bandit to a luxury cell and for putting other people and animals (that he was accountable to, whether he recognizes it or not) at risk. Mr. Trow’s arrogance and political agenda are responsible for the painful lives and deaths of so many animals. And if these things don’t haunt him before he goes to sleep at night, then I don’t know what could.
Well said Cheryl! All points I’d have made, but you did it for me. Bandit was AFRAID. Not only were staff afraid of him, he was afraid of them. He should have been protected and preventing rehearsal of any of the aggressive behaviours, cause as you know, practice makes perfect. Was he hoarding these animals? It sure sounds that way n
Mr. Trow was indirectly responsible for the death of my cousin who was an employee of THS. He was bitten by a diseased cat which led to blood poisoning when he was pressured to return to work with this terrible infection. They did not report this to the WSIB in order to keep their employee injury rating at what they thought was an acceptable leve. Shame on him and all the others who ran THS for putting animals before the safety of their staff!!!
Most of you people are insane.
A life, even if imperfect is better than death.
Yes, the OSPCA has nice, squeaky clean cages with happy animals. That’s because they kill all the ones in the back rooms that don’t meet that standard.
Trow did everything he could to keep these animals alive. Granted, he took some extreme measures, but the suggestion that he cared more about money than the animals is ludicrous. He worked 7 days a week, 16 hours a day, for free and you idiots think he cared about the money?
He cared about sustainability, creating more spaces for the animals and saving as many lives as possible.
There are some medical facilities in the 3rd world that aren’t great, but keep people alive. Do you suppose, some heroes should go in there and just kill all of those people, so they don’t suffer?
Articles like this helps me decide where I donate my money. I would never donate to this organization again. I don’t believe that they used the money to better the lives of animals given up for adoption. I have lost all trust in The Toronto Humane Society.
When this was happening in the fall of 2009,I was in the market for a pet and visited Toronto Humane many times. My dog who was from THS had been put down in August at the age of 12; she had been a wonderful pet and so I returned to find another. However, I was appalled that there were dogs waiting for adoption who were 14 years of age; cats who looked very ill and were over 15 years of age. The place was dirty, smelly and crowded; cats were in cages with their feces; young workers seemed to be struggling to keep up. Tim Trow was sitting in the lobby with a friend and he had a temper tantrum while I was there, shouting and screaming at an employee; his outburst was frightening. There were a few animals I felt a connection with, but many of the animals seemed distressed; they all sense when things are not right! I could not make a choice and returned later with my husband who was totally put off by the conditions. I was drawn to a black spaniel but before I could get back, the “raid” occurred.
Then the OSPCA drama made the news. I was and continue to be totally disgusted by both agencies. I withdrew my financial support of the OSPCA and THS and am looking for other ways to help the animals. We have adopted a dog from the Hamilton SPCA. I love most dogs and cats; it is too bad that too many fanatical and stupid humans have so much power over them. Maybe I will pop by THS to see if the atmosphere has improved.
May Tim Trow live a very long life… in a hospital bed, neatly tucked into a hospital ceiling where his cries can be ignored until they eventually stop… and somebody doing a newspaper article that launches an investigation may one day discover a mummified Trow. That would be a fitting end to this tail…
I had one occasion to meet Mr. Trow and that was enough. It was an experience I will never forget. I was seeking the assistance of THS to secure the return of my dog, adopted from the THS, which had been stolen by someone. Mr. Trow was belligerent, unsympathetic and basically just plain obnoxious. When I attempted to explain to him that the contract I signed with THS, upon adoption of my dog, gave them the right to revoke my adoption and repossess the dog, he completely ignored me and walked away as though I wasn’t even engaged in a conversation with him. The man possesses no people skills, no tact, and it is a complete mystery to me how on earth he ever became head of the THS. Good Riddance!
Although I am fond of animals and when the children were young had a few, mainly because we felt that ownership would help them understand what responsability meant …It has paid off in spades.
But all those people out there should look to the world of poverty and what that means to others and take their hands off their hearts and do something!!!
its not about the animals its about money and power bc is in a mess some think has to give having health animals stollen in front of there must be lawyers working on this mess with spca i heard there legal students investicating spca
One of my cats was originally a foster cat from Mr. Trow’s foster care program. He had been a stray hit by a car and his back end was crushed. A friend nursed him back to health, and I eventually met him and fell absolutely in love with him. My friend let me adopt him and I had his companionship for many years before I eventually had to euthanize him for advanced cancer of the mouth. My kitty was beloved by all that met him and when I knew I had to say goodbye to him, I took him around to the neighbours so they could say goodbye too. If the THS hadn’t given my kitty that chance at life, I never would have met him and my life would have been much poorer. Many people would have given up on him and said he wasn’t worth saving. He was, and I am so grateful to have had that time with him.
The THS wasn’t perfect, and neither is Mr. Trows – passionate people are rarely wonderful diplomats. I guess I believe the same as he does – that animals are as deserving of life as humans, and that if we wouldn’t kill a human being under the same circumstance, we shouldn’t kill an animal either. I do believe in euthanasia for humans, and for animals, under very specific circumstances. I don’t believe in the death penalty.
We love our animals so often, but we so often abuse them too. The story is heartbreaking because now more animals will be euthanized that don’t have to be. Why can’t we build more shelters, put more money into them, more vet care, spay and neuter them? Give them a chance, rather than just say they aren’t worth saving? Surely our loving companions deserve more than this.
Cheryl’s comment is excellent. The article is unfocussed. It’s ridiculous to say that “For all Trow’s faults, his passionate activism had a following,” in an attempt to explain the donation revenue losses. Surely many donors had no idea of the horrible suffering of animals that was going on in there.They cancelled or reduced their support in response to the scandal, and it will take a long time for the new THS to win back that lost credibility. The economy also has to be behind some of the revenue drop. I was always skeptical and felt uneasy about that low euthanasia figure.
Trow’s euthanasia numbers were so low because he made them up. Morris would have done well to get the real numbers which show a terrible mortality rate, low adoption rates and thousands of dead in their cages from neglect. This is just one of the many misrepresentations in the article which a little responsible journalism would have uncovered. I wonder why Morris didn’t bother to put in that the THS was found to have breached Section 10(1) of the charities accounting act, and that the board was dissolved as a result? The criminal charges weren’t persued for who-know’s-why, but they were sure proven in Civil court.
Finally, some decent research on the issue instead of the endless rhetoric! We’d have even more facts had the media not stuck its muck-raking nose into the investigation while it was still ongoing. No one looks good here, the whole mess was botched from start to end.
No one will ever agree on the value of letting sick and injured animals die in their cages versus euthanizing them, but low rates are nearly always bolstered by overcrowding (which promotes stress and disease) as well as pawning off unadoptable animals to Animal Control so a 7% rate is fishy at best. This happens at several shelters in Ontario.
The bottom line is that hiring unqualified workers and putting staff at risk of injury and death is unconscionable and illegal. He should be in prison for that alone. However, there is ample evidence that indicates that he is a hoarder. Prison terms do not help with that, only treatment. I hope he is getting it.
Under all the rhetoric is the fact that a few disgruntled employees with a personality conflict with their boss (Mr. Trow) manipulated the OSPCA (who for their own reasons were only too willing to be involved) into bringing down the Toronto Humane Society.
People should be aware that the “new” THS run now by the “reformers” does not take in strays. In other words, they are no longer rescuing. They “work with” other rescue groups, which means they cherry-pick from other rescues, taking adoptable cats and dogs from them for the River Street location. They accept pets from owners who have to relinquish them, on payment of a fee ($60 I believe it is) but they don’t accept “drop-offs” or “found dogs.” All lost and abandoned dogs and cats are left now for the OSPCA and their euthanasia policy.
The old THS mandate of helping abandoned and neglected animals has been lost in the “reformers” quest for pristine and spacious conditions and happy unhurried staff. And that’s why people like myself who supported the “old” THS will not fund the “new” one and are finding other rescue groups to support.
Lena, I am so very sorry about your cousin’s death. I’d heard rumours of his death and the reason, but neither was ever confirmed in print anywhere. It was absolutely avoidable if he had received antibiotic treatment immediately after the bite.
The THS raid was about the suffering and dying of the animals, and the old guard had to go in order for the animals’ suffering and dying to stop.
The new board is making a huge difference in the operations of the THS. If you withdrew support because of the old guard, please write, call or visit the new THS. I think you’ll be pleased and hope you’ll consider returning your support to THS.
Reva D, bite me. You have no idea what people are involved in or working on, and personally I can work on more than one issue at a time. This is an animal welfare issue, take your poverty ragging to an appropriate article. Otherwise, I’ll start going on poverty articles and rag you about animal welfare. Hey, go for it, put your money where your mouth is; sell everything you’ve got and give it away. I’d pay a buck to see that. Get over it. There will always be poverty. So long as one person has more than another, the latter will be crying poverty regardless of how hard the former worked for it.
Judith, by law the THS CANNOT accept strays. The old THS was breaking the law by taking strays.
The old THS didn’t work with rescues, even though rescues tried very, very hard to get animals moved out of that hellhole. The new THS does work with rescues.
Get yer research right.
I worked at the THS for many years at a time when we believe in helping owners keep there pets rather then take them from them and running a low cost spay/neuter clinic to help reduce population. We worked with rescue people to help place difficult pets and made sure all animals were spay/neutered or at least a committment was made to do so once they were of age. Once Mr Trow came on board life for staff and animals changed and in a negative way. I was told we didn’t need rescue groups help because animals didn’t need to be rescued from the THS. But they did and so did all of us staff. Coming to work each day and picking out all the dead animals before starting work took it’s toll on many of us and our dreams of helping animals was desolved into a dread of going to work to face animals we couldn’t help. I stated to Mr Trow that it was wrong that a lost healthy animal comes here just to become so ill it dies and was harassed and told it I didn’t like it leave and I did but feel sadden. No matter how the end of his time came about I thanked god for all the animals that would never have to enter those doors to suffer again
I read this article with interest for two reasons. First as a fourth year vet student I know and understand the ethical dilemmas surrounding euthanasia. Believe me it is never an easy decision and no vet ever wants to euthanize an animal, however the oath we take when we graduate is that we will up hold animal welfare above everything else, and unfortunately sometimes that means euthanizing an animal. At the end of the day the major issue for me with the way Tim Trow ran the THS was that he did not allow the vets on staff to make clinical decisions for what was in the best interests of the animals welfare. This would create a very stressful working environment and it is illegal. Secondly on a personal note I volunteered at the THS the summer after my first year of vet school and was appalled with what occurred. There were very few trained staff members attempting to provide medical care for far too many animals. I primarily worked in the kitten nursery and it wasn’t uncommon to find at least 3 or 4 kittens that had died in their cages every time I was in. Over all it was a very negative experience. I sincerely hope that the changes being implemented will be positive ones and that the THS will go back to it’s former self
Does anyone recall that cat that died in a trap in the ceiling? I DO. I also recall many other cats that died SLOWLY and PAINFULLY in the Distemper Room. The only and one time I was in that room (I have pet cats so I could not go in there due to policy) was enough to traumatize me for life. The neglect, the pain in there, it was horrible. That’s how Trow kept the euthanasia numbers low: Death of ‘natural causes’ aka NEGLECT. Who knows how long it took that poor cat in that trap in the ceiling to die of starvation. What a horrible death. That cat was not a stray, he had a name. It’s been proven. Get some facts.
what was the dead cats name?