Toronto Star continues its, er, dogged reporting on the Special Investigation Unit

The Toronto Star (who else?) has the story:

The SIU said Peel police also would not release Wyatt’s history of occurrences, formally called Police Dog Services Search Reports, to determine if there were reasonable grounds for a criminal charge.

“These reports would be very useful in determining if Wyatt had a prior propensity to bite and not release,” Scott wrote. “Further they may inform the question of the subject officer’s prior knowledge of the dog’s propensity.”

Obviously, this isn’t the first time the SIU has run up against the so-called “blue wall of silence.” We’ve followed the Star’s tireless reporting on the SIU closely, and there seems to be little to inspire confidence in the unit’s ability to do its job. Police have continuously stonewalled the watchdog, and the organization has also appeared at times somewhat sloppy (interesting fact: the SIU has opened 3,400 cases since 1990, but sent only three police officers to prison—which means either the police have a sterling record or the SIU is ineffective).

Given that police accountability has become something of a hot-button issue in the province in the wake of last summer’s G20 summit, we wonder if it’s about time the watchdog’s role became an election issue. Of course, in one corner, there’s have an incumbent who has repeatedly denied calls for a public inquiry into the G20 policing fiasco; in the other, there’s Tim Hudak, whose allegiances seem pretty clear.

• Police blocking probe into dog attack, SIU says [Toronto Star] • Peel cops and SIU at odds in dog bite incident [Toronto Sun]