Frequent Liar Points

Radler indicated remorse, but it’s quite difficult to unravel whether it was remorse for committing the deeds or remorse over getting caught doing it. Perhaps even he doesn’t know. He had lots of time to be remorseful about the deeds before he got caught, and there is certainly little evidence of any pre-apprehension remorse.

So the Radler testimony painted a pretty bleak picture: executives behaving badly, pointing fingers, expressing unconvincing remorse and, all the while, taking up a lot of time of the court and the hired guns.

There was really only one saving grace in the whole extended Radler testimony: the fact that he took such offence at being called a liar and, in particular, being characterized as an inveterate, serial, lie-whenever-useful liar. This was the only time it appeared to me that Radler got livid. If you think about it, that comes as a bit of a surprise. He did admit to lying repeatedly. He showed no concern for the welfare of shareholders as he salted away personal non-compete payments and sold their papers to related companies for personal benefit. He showed no concern for the legal welfare of his closest colleagues. So why cavil at being called a liar?

To me it indicates that there is actually a soul hidden somewhere deep inside this otherwise scheming man. He doesn’t want to be seen or characterized as entirely without moral fibre. That tells me that he isn’t completely beyond rehabilitation, completely incapable of existing in a world that works on the basis of trust, mutuality and concern for the greater good.