Toronto Movie Index

Sex and the City (**)

Posted on May 30, 2008 by David Balzer

image for Sex and the City (**)

Sex and the City used to be a good show—a fact that faded further from view during its last few seasons, and of which the movie version seems terrified to remind us too often. This goodness was not rocket science. People liked the show’s four strong female leads, their unblushing attitudes toward sex, and especially the way they talked with each other: an assortment of bons mots, ribald neologisms and frank, sisterly advice. Sex and the City was always a fantasy, but its characters had authenticity. They wanted irrational things; were driven to absurd, humiliating lengths in pursuit of them; and were usually made to face, in the series’s perpetual moral, some form of compromise.

Carrie Bradshaw’s desire in the movie version of Sex and the City is nothing short of marriage to jerky capitalist Mr. Big—and it’s all wrong. The problem is not that the wedding she aggressively plans in the movie’s first half-hour thwarts her, but that this thwarting is only temporary. Humanity and equilibrium are missing from this particular rendering of Sarah Jessica Parker’s faux-feminist character; writer-director Michael Patrick King (who also wrote and directed for the show) either has her blithely indulging her own happiness via designer shopping sprees and redecorating schemes, or all ashen-faced and pouting about being jilted. (When she says, in response to someone mistaking her for Big’s new wife after he deserts her, “That was like taking a bullet,” one only wants to chortle, or perhaps puke.)

Kim Catrall’s Samantha and Kristin Davis’s Charlotte have little to contribute to the unfolding Cinderella story, other than to provide brief reminders of the series’s penchant for gross-out humour. Cynthia Nixon’s Miranda does her part in this respect as well, though thankfully she does a bit more, functioning, as she always has, as a voice of pragmatism, intellect and principle. It seems futile to wish this frivolous film were about her, for then it would have to deal with a working woman raising a kid in Brooklyn with a guy who makes less than her—instead of an indolent, whiny Manhattanite who finally lands that rich husband who’ll pay all her bills at Blahnik’s.

Sex and the City is now playing at the Beach Cinema (1651 Queen St. E.), Scotiabank Theatre (259 Richmond St. W.) and SilverCity Yonge-Eglinton Centre (2300 Yonge St.).

Comments

Neither the author nor Toronto Life necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Editors will not correct spelling or grammar. Toronto Life reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. Read our full policy

Kim May 30, 2008 at 2:37 p.m.

I thought this movie was F-a-b-u-l-o-u-s with a CAPITAL F. Please don't hate and just enjoy the show for what it is. This movie deserved at least a 3.5*

Chloe May 31, 2008 at 5:48 p.m.

I loved this movie! I am 45, married, kids, great job...I need no fantasy entertainment to brighten my life. Nobody can say I liked this movie simply because it filled a void. It was great fun, beautifully filmed and the ending was perfect...there is no need to make a sequel.

aboy June 2, 2008 at 3:32 p.m.

You know, I thought the movie was total piffle and that this review is right - the show was pretty good because it made everyone complex, but the movie just glosses over all that with clothes and shoes and capitalism and bright flashes of light.

Miss. E June 3, 2008 at 12:17 a.m.

Oh relax with the uptight review, its simply a fun and fabulous movie allowing women to laugh, cry and cheer. I do think that only those who appreciated the tv series will enjoy the movie, for everyone else there is always Indiana Jones 4.

Mike June 3, 2008 at 3:17 p.m.

The capitulation of feminism is complete, but you look f-a-b-u-l-o-u-s.

Lauren June 4, 2008 at 11:33 a.m.

I agree with this review! I felt like I was the only woman who didn't enjoy this movie. Forget calling people uptight; the movie completely abandoned what these women were built to stand for over the six seasons of the phenomenal show. I found the movie to be completely indulgent. Yes, the show is about fashion and love partially but it's moreso about singledom in the later years of life and sex. Both aspects lacked in the film. Jennifer Hudson is a terrible actress and the whole "love conquers all" idea that rounded out the movie was nothing short of cheesy. The fashion was over-indulgent even for this show. 4 women in their 40s watching as the main character parades around her apartment in her old clothes? Unlikely. The film was completely out of touch with what anyone who understood the show would want. Anyone who enjoyed it must be superficial and lacking in intellect.

quite June 4, 2008 at 2 p.m.

i am firmly in lauren's camp on this one. the movie abandons the show's philosophy and mindset, its complexity and morality. but that's not all - it also abandons the witty banter, the clever observations, the sense of humor of the show. say anything you want about principles and message - and i could say plenty - the major problem with the movie is that it is just not funny.

Abby June 4, 2008 at 10:55 p.m.

I LOVED THIS MOVIE!!! Am hoping for sequels.

Unabbey June 4, 2008 at 11:45 p.m.

Sequels? Abbey, do us all a favour and only see this movie once. If I see one more girl on subway with a giant flower on her dress, I'll kill myself.

Deanna June 7, 2008 at 10:57 a.m.

This movie is going to have a sequel for the same reason Harold & Kumar is having a sequel. There's always an audience for broad humour, inconsistent characters, and thin plots.

Mari Henry October 23, 2008 at 9:19 p.m.

[This comment has been removed.]


Post a comment

Your name:

Comment:

Toronto Movie Index RSS Feed